Discussing the Apex Legends meta can be a boring topic for battle royale fans. While Respawn Entertainment is constantly making adjustments and balance adjustments, the gaming community is always reaching out to fans and geeks. This is a situation where you can't please everyone, and that's okay. But where does this leave the definition of play? It's too easy to refer to selection ratings, earnings statistics, and rating distribution to dictate this, but there are several reasons why it's even worse.
When you think about why people choose the Apex Legends character they play the most, there are a lot of reasons that really shouldn't affect the Apex Legends tier list. Even players desperate to climb the Apex Legends ranks choose who to use in their next game based on random factors like which character lines they like best or which characters they've recently unlocked cosmetics for.
These factors, while important to each of our personal experiences with a game like Apex Legends, have absolutely nothing to do with how well one character gets along with another. However, as we've seen with every new season of Apex Legends (thanks to the State of Apex Legends), this can affect pick frequency. This in turn affects the Apex Legends characters that people play as, especially if you're just looking online to see who's the best and misleading meta.
Discussing this on Reddit through the lens of the Crypto character exchange, Apex Legends players also made some important points about what to avoid when it comes to meta-creation and excluding unpopular legends from discussing it.
CFDsForFun notes that "Crypto was a popular pick" at the recent ALGS tournament, noting that Crypto will always suffer from a lower pick rate because "some characters weren't built to destroy the [unranked battle royale lobby]".
One Apex Legends fan, Nouveauuu, also pointed out the fact that "people like to play as a character that doesn't rely too much on teamwork" when they're in a random battle royale lobby. Also worth considering is the fact that legends like Crypto, Wattson, Rampart, and Caustic are situational, which will make them difficult to use in an unranked lobby game where teamwork is not a priority.
Master Valkyrie "Muddy236" also commented on the fact that some legendary characters are more skilled than others when it comes to making the most of their abilities. So when you consider the fact that his main attack method in Apex Legends is still weapons he finds scattered all over the map, it's easy to see why players prefer a legend that's easier to hit even at high levels.
Ideas for personal improvement. Let's discuss the character changes we would like to see in Legends.
Of course, avoiding peaks and popularity ratings when it comes to meta information and choosing the best legends is not a universal rule; There are times when the low (or high) popularity of a myth is indicative of its imbalance. However, he should not dictate the speech and should not have the weight that at the moment seems to be the decisive factor.
The Seer, as a legend, is a near-perfect example of the problems associated with relying on probabilities of choice. As Pan_Doktor explained, the Seer was removed and then several players kicked him, causing his pick speed to suffer. However, after proving his popularity at the recent ALGS tournament, his picks have increased. This has led to an increase in complaints and calls, but doesn't account for the fact that Seer hasn't changed much in recent updates. People see it more because more people play it because it was popular in esports where it was used by high level players who worked together for hours.
The fact that what works for a few pro players in a game where your weapon prowess surpasses your prowess with legendary abilities affects pick speed and imposes a meta just makes one wonder if the meta is really capable of it . installed.
The release date for Apex Legends Season 16 is just around the corner, and with it, a new set of Apex Legends Notes with balanced settings and updates. However, will this change anything in society's views on who needs an apprentice and who needs a buffet? We want it to happen, but we don't believe it will.